What are the positives to this method?
|
What challenges might they face?
|
Does the author recommend this method? How do you know?
| |
Underwater camera
|
It is good to use because you can see all sea life and you could investigate what the species are.
It would also be good to be able to have eyes in the water so that they see any new life under the water that they can not see.
|
Some type of plant grows in front of the camera and they lose all vision on the sea life and they can not investigate any of the species.
They could face a challenge when they see no life or nothing and they get confused on why they can’t see anything.
|
No
|
Diver transect survey
|
They could find some very good photos and data from what fish/Species they are.
They could find some new fish and species and they could also find some new plants.
|
They could scare away all of the sea life by just going near them.
It could scarel the fish away from the camera and they can’t analyse any of the sea life.
|
No
|
Hook and line survey
|
This way could be good to get a fish examine it and then they put it back in the water and let it be free and take it back and they examine it and identify what species.
| ||
Acoustic Survey
|
What do you think is the best method? Why?
No comments:
Post a Comment
To support my learning I ask you to comment as follows:
1. Something positive - Begin with a greeting. Talk about something you like about what I have shared.
2. Thoughtful - A comment that will mean something to me to let me know you read/watched or listened to what I had to say. - use any language.
3. Something helpful - Give me some ideas for next time or ask me a question.
Encourage me to make another post
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.